Please note that the following article is strictly to provide information and neither the content nor transmissions through this website
are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.
Most governing documents require membership approval before pursuing a construction defects claim (CD). Obtaining approval is sometimes inconvenient, risky, complicated and is based on technical provisions of each association's Bylaws, CC&Rs, election rules and the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (DSA). Nevertheless, the failure to obtain that approval can be fatal to an Association's right to bring a claim as the Association learned in Branches Neighborhood Corporation. v Calatlantic Group, (filed 8/10/2018, publication order 8/24/2018).
The case can be read here: http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/G055201.PDF.
In that case, the Association initiated a request to arbitrate a construction defect claim exceeding $5,000,000 against the project developer without first obtaining the approval of the membership. Citing the CC&R provision that required a membership vote and approval prior to bringing that claim, the developer successfully persuaded an arbitrator to dismiss the case. That dismissal was upheld on appeal.
The Association made several arguments attempting to save its case: that the voting requirement as written in these CC&Rs was contrary to public policy, had to be read in conjunction with certain provisions of the DSA and, especially that the membership ultimately approved and ratified bringing the claim after it was filed.
The Court was unpersuaded; it rejected application of the DSA to this particular set of CC&Rs and strictly construed the provision requiring membership approval prior to bringing the claim. It concluded that the prior approval was consistent with other statutes in the DSA which purport to put a check on Board power. In other words, even though the alleged defects repair costs were more than $5,000,000 the Association's case was lost because there was no CD vote and approval before commencement of the arbitration process.
The really sad part of the Branches case is that when the ratification vote was finally taken, 92 of the 93 HOA members that participated supported the claim.
We believe not all construction conditions are defects and not all defects justify arbitration or litigation. But, when the defects are serious and pervasive, with good planning, experienced legal advice, strict compliance with voting requirements applicable to each community, it can make a difference between financial loss and large special assessments and a successful recovery, repair, and preservation of property values.
For more about the processes and procedures that can make the difference between a Branches result and a successful one, contact Jill Jackson (firstname.lastname@example.org), or give us a call at: 800.838.2090.
Condominiums are a nice concept, but the reality has been less than perfect.
Effective in 2022, new laws and statutory amendments affecting California CID homeowner association operations
Once primarily an economic problem, hidden damage has become a much more severe problema matter of life and death.
Sign up for Berding|Weil's Community Association ALERT Newsletter, providing Legal News, Comments, and Great Ideas for Community Association Boards and Managers.
Please Note: To ensure delivery to your inbox (not bulk or junk folders), please add email@example.com to your address book and/or allow emails from berding-weil.com to pass through your automated anti-spam software or service.
As one of the largest and most experienced construction defect litigation departments in the nation, we have recovered over 1.8 billion for our clients.
The content on this website is strictly to provide information and neither the content nor transmissions through this website are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.